Belize News,

 Breaking News
  • BOMBED BY THE F.T.C. PM Barrow Says ‘It Wasn’t Me!’ Prime Minister Dean Barrow called an unusual last minute press conference on Wednesday at the Princess Ramada Hotel, a venue seldom used, and unleashed an almost two hour tirade vigorously...
  • Salazar: FTC Got It Wrong Friday, July 12th. 2019 – Senator Aldo Salazar, following the Prime Minister’s press conference regarding the Sanctuary Bay real estate scam, spoke with the Reporter on Thursday and also denied...
  • Eight Belizean Beauties…One Title Friday, July 12th. 2019 – Plans to get the 2019 Miss Universe Belize Pageant underway have already commenced and last Friday the organizers introduced the eight Belizean, beauties that are...
  • Want A US Visa? Watch What You Post Online! Friday, July 12th. 2019 – If you are thinking about applying for a US Visa to tour, shop or study in that country, you might want to be careful of...

Bennett U.S Extradition Case ‘Stayed’- & Going To Supreme Court

Bennett U.S Extradition Case ‘Stayed’- & Going To Supreme Court
June 07
16:55 2019

Thursday, June 6, 2019 –
Attorney Andrew Bennett, who faces an extradition proceeding for his alleged role in a money laundering sting conducted by US authorities, was back in Court on Tuesday for what should have been the start of the hearing. Instead, his attorneys made a “case stayed” submission, essentially claiming Bennett’s constitutional rights were violated.

Bennett’s extradition case is taking place in the Magistrate’s Court. However, the case stayed submission will be heard by the Supreme Court. While the case stayed is being heard by the Supreme Court, the extradition hearing will be temporarily put on hold until the higher court reaches a determination on whether Bennett’s rights were violated.
Linked News Article

Bennett’s attorneys, Anthony Sylvestre and Iliana Swift contend that a missing document, which was not initially included in the extradition bundle of documents, should not be allowed by the Court at this point. In addition, the attorneys claim that US authorities illegally intercepted Bennett’s communications and are using those contents against him. The lawyers argue that there should have been Supreme Court approval under the Interception of Communications Act.

The prosecution, represented by the Director of Public Prosecutions Cheryl-Lynn Vidal and Assistant Solicitor General, Samantha Matute-Tucker, indicated that they will not object to the application and will fight the Supreme Court proceedings.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Related Articles

search bar

Sunbright Ad